Understanding Criminal Law from a Human Rights Perspective: an interview with Prof. Raquel Scalcon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v13i23.426Abstract
The Revista da CGU inaugurates through this edition an innovative section of academic publications in an interview format. The purpose of the new section is to present society with current, relevant, and dense discussions in a more dynamic and open format than the traditional configuration of academic articles. Fostering new formats of academic and scientific communication is an obligation imposed by the reality in which we live: the times when academics could communicate only with each other and only through strictly academic articles are already a thing of the past. The plurality of current forms of communication - audio interviews, podcasts, videos, newsletters - needs to be incorporated by the academy, as a science that does not communicate with the general public is necessarily more closed, less diverse, and less effective.
It is a great honor to inaugurate this section with Profa. Dr. Raquel Lima Scalcon, whose academic production is nationally and internationally recognized as innovative and disruptive. The work of Profa. Raquel is marked by transversality and interdisciplinarity: her understanding of legal phenomena is built from the borders of Constitutional, Administrative, and Criminal Law.
Downloads
References
ALEXY, Robert. Teoria dos Direitos Fundamentais. Traduzido por Virgílio Afonso da Silva. São Paulo: Malheiros,
[1985].
BERTOIN, Patrícia Tuma Martins. Mulheres na Advocacia: Padrões Masculinos de Carreira ou Teto de Vidro. Rio
de Janeiro, Lumen Juris, 2017.
DWORKIN, Ronald. O Domínio da Vida: Aborto, Eutanásia e Liberdades Individuais. São Paulo, Martins Fontes,
EPSTEIN, David. Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialized World. New York, Riverhead Books, 2019.
HALTOM, William; McCANN, Michale. Distorting the Law: Politics, Media and the Litigation Crisis. Chicago,
University of Chicago, 2004.
HONG, Lu; Page, Scott. Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers can outperform groups of high-abilityh problem
solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, n. 101 (46), v. 46.
LANDEMORE, Hélène. Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century. Princeton,
Princeton University Press, 2020.
SCALCON, Raquel L. Ilícito e Pena: modelos opostos de fundamentação do Direito Penal Contemporâneo. 1. ed.
Rio de Janeiro: GZ Editora, 2013.
SCALCON, Raquel L. Controle Constitucional de Leis Penais: da prognose legislativa sobre os efeitos potenciais
e concretos da lei penal aos deveres de seu monitoramento e de melhoria da lei penal. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro:
Lumen Juris, 2018.
SCALCON, Raquel L Rationality of the Legislative Process as a Material Element in Constitutional Control. Rechtsphilosophie - Zeitschrift für Grundlagen des Rechts, v. 5, p. 88-98, 2019.
SCALCON, Raquel; TEIXEIRA, A. Main Dogmatic Aspects of Corruption Crimes in Brazil Related to Operation
Car Wash. In: Fabio Ramazzini Bechara & Paulo C. Goldschmidt. (Org.). Lessons of operation Car Wash: A Legal,
Institutional and Economic Analysis. 1ed.Washington: Wilson Center, 2020, v. 1, p. 112-123.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista da CGU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Revista da CGU follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows the use and sharing of published works with mandatory indication of authors and sources. Contents published until 2019 have generic permission for use and sharing with mandatory indication of authorship and source.
We highlight some essential and non-exhaustive points related:
- The submission of the proposal implies a commitment not to submit it to another journal and authorizes if approved, its publication.
- The submission of the proposal also implies that the author(s) agrees with the publication, without resulting in remuneration, reimbursement, or compensation of any kind.
- The published texts are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the journal.
- Responsibility for any plagiarism is the responsibility of the author(s).
- The person responsible for the submission declares, under the penalties of the Law, that the information on the authorship of the work is complete and correct.
Also highlighted are the items related to our Editorial Policies, in particular on the Focus and Scope, Publication Ethics, Peer Review Process, and Open Access Policy.
