TRANSPARENCY FOR A “SOCIOLOGICAL TURN”
The Right to Information for the effectiveness of other Fundamental Rights: an interview with Prof. David Pozen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v14i25.518Abstract
Revista da CGU opens its commemorative dossier for the 10th anniversary of the Freedom of Information Act in Brazil with an interview section. The interview is an instrument of scientific communication that provides the opportunity to involve society in current, relevant and dense discussions, in a more dynamic and open format than traditional academic articles.
The editors Flavia Xavier and Marcus Vinicius Braga proposed the questions, and work on the right to information through a social perspective. The provocation is to think critically, beyond existing structures. Enjoy these discussions!
It is a great honor to open this dossier with Prof. David Pozen, who is the Vice Dean for Intellectual Life and Charles Keller Beekman Professor of Law at Columbia University in the United States of America.
A scholar with a wide range of practical experience in the Department of State, the Supreme Court, and the Senate, Professor Pozen has written numerous articles and essays on transparency and related topics.
In 2018, Professor Pozen and Professor Michael Schudson edited the book Troubling Transparency: The History and Future of Freedom of Information, which brought together distinguished scholars to evaluate the history and future of the U.S. Freedom of Information Act. In 2020, he edited the book The Perilous Public Square: Structural Threats to Free Expression Today, which identifies and assesses threats to freedom of expression posed by the rise of authoritarian populism, technological change, and other forces.
Downloads
References
Amy Kapczynski (February 14, 2022). Deep Dive Freedom from the Marketplace of Speech. Blog Lies and the Law. Disponível em:
https://knightcolumbia.org/blog/freedom-from-the-marketplace-of-speech
Ben-Shahar, Omri and Schneider, Carl E., The Failure of Mandated Disclosure (March 1, 2010). U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 516, U of Michigan Law & Econ, Empirical Legal Studies Center Paper No. 10-008, Disponível em:
https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1091&context=penn_law_review ou http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1567284
Pozen, David E., Freedom of Information Beyond the Freedom of Information Act. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 165, pp. 1097-1158, 2017, Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2907719
Pozen, David E., Seeing Transparency More Clearly (2020). Public Administration Review, Vol. 80, pp. 326-31, 2020, Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3478005
Pozen, David E., Transparency's Ideological Drift (2018). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 128, pp. 100-65, 2018, Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3120807
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da CGU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Revista da CGU follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows the use and sharing of published works with mandatory indication of authors and sources. Contents published until 2019 have generic permission for use and sharing with mandatory indication of authorship and source.
We highlight some essential and non-exhaustive points related:
- The submission of the proposal implies a commitment not to submit it to another journal and authorizes if approved, its publication.
- The submission of the proposal also implies that the author(s) agrees with the publication, without resulting in remuneration, reimbursement, or compensation of any kind.
- The published texts are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the journal.
- Responsibility for any plagiarism is the responsibility of the author(s).
- The person responsible for the submission declares, under the penalties of the Law, that the information on the authorship of the work is complete and correct.
Also highlighted are the items related to our Editorial Policies, in particular on the Focus and Scope, Publication Ethics, Peer Review Process, and Open Access Policy.
