Impact assessment of the CGU audits in Fundef resources
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v7i10.8Abstract
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact of the Brazilian’s Office of the Comptroller General (CGU) oversight program through public sweepstakes in public funds for primary education. Municipalities monitored by CGU in 2003 and 2004 were compared with the other municipalities in four dimensions and in two different years. Management indicators of the municipal elementary schools have been prepared on the dimensions of equipment, infrastructure, facilities and faculty/staff. The dimensions were compared between schools of municipalities monitored and non-monitored in the medium term. Significant difference was found only in the schools equipment’s dimension. After four years, schools of the cities monitored by the CGU are on average 2.3% better provisioned with audiovisual teaching equipment (TV, VCR, satellite dish, and over-head projector) and computing equipment (computers, printers, internet and computer labs). In the other three dimensions, there were no significant differences between the indicators of the municipalities that were audited and those that were not inspected by the CGU.
Downloads
References
ALAM, M. S. A theory of limits on corruption and some applications. Kyklos, v. 48, n. 3, p. 419-435, 1995.
ANGRIST, J. D.; PISCHKE, J.S.Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An empiricist’s companion.1º ed, Princeton University Press, 2008.
ARRETCHE, M. T. S. Políticas sociais no Brasil: descentralização em um Estado federativo. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, jun. 1999. v. 14, n. 40, p. 111–141.
BECKER, G. Crime and Punishment: na economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 76, No. 2, pp. 169-217, Mar./Apr. 1968.
BRASIL.MEC. INEP. Censo Escolar da Educação Básica de 2000, 2002 e 2009. Disponível em:. Acesso em: 05 mai2014.
_______.MEC. INEP. Sinopse Estatística da Educação Básica: 2000, 2002 e 2009. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 05 mai. 2014.
_______. MF. STN. Boletim Mensal FUNDEB/FUNDEF. Disponível em. <http://www3.tesouro.gov.br/
estados_municipios/boletim_fundebfundef.asp.>. Acesso em 05 mai. 2014.
_______.MTE. RAIS – Relatório Anual de Informações Sociais.de 2000, 2002 e 2009. Disponível em:
//bi.mte.gov.br/bgcaged/login.php>. Acesso em: 05 mai. 2014.
DI TELLA, R.; SCHARGRODSKY, E. The Role of Wages and Auditing During a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos Aires. Journal of Law and Economics, 46, Vol. 1, pp.269-292, Abril 2003.
FERRAZ, C.; FINAN, F. Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil’s Publicly Released Audits on Electoral
Outcomes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 5 jan. 2008. v. 123, n. 2, p. 703–745...
FOGUEL, F. G. Diferenças em Diferenças. In: MENEZES-FILHO N. A. (Org.). Avaliação Econômica de Projetos Sociais. São Paulo, Dinâmica Gráfica e Editora, 2012, p. 69-84. Disponível em . Acesso em: 05 maio. 2014
MENDES, M. Análise das irregularidades na administração municipal do FUNDEF: Constatações do programa de fiscalização a partir de sorteios públicos da Controladoria Geral da União. Disponível em:<http://bvc.cgu.gov.br/>. Brasília, 2004. Acesso em: 04 mai. 2014.
_______. Descentralização do ensino fundamental: Avaliação de resultados do Fundef. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, 5 out. 2009. v. 0, n. 24.
OLKEN, B. Monitoring corruption. Journal of Political Economy.Vol. 115, no 2, pp.200-249, April 2007.
REIS, R. V. A Performance Measurement Framework for the Brazilian Office of the Comptroller General (CGU) Based on International Frameworks, 2012. Disponível em <http://www.gwu.edu/~ibi/pesquisa.
html>. Acesso em: 05 mai. 2014.
REZENDE, F. Federalismo fiscal no Brasil. Revista de Economia Política, v.15,n.3, p.5-17, jul./set. 1995.
SOARES, S. S. D.; NASCIMENTO, P. A. M. M. Evolution of the cognitive achievement of Brazilian youth on Pisa. Cadernos de Pesquisa, abr. 2012. v. 42, n. 145, p. 68–87.
VELOSO, F. 15 anos de avanços na educação no Brasil: Onde estamos? In: VELOSO, F. et al. (Org.). Educação básica no Brasil: construindo o país do futuro. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier-Campus, 2009. p. 117-143.
ZAMBONI FILHO, Y. B. Avaliando o avaliador: evidências de um experimento de campo sobre as auditorias da CGU. [S.l.]: [s.n.], 2012. Thesis. Disponível em: <http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/ handle/10438/10163>. Acesso em: 4mai. 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista da CGU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Revista da CGU follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows the use and sharing of published works with mandatory indication of authors and sources. Contents published until 2019 have generic permission for use and sharing with mandatory indication of authorship and source.
We highlight some essential and non-exhaustive points related:
- The submission of the proposal implies a commitment not to submit it to another journal and authorizes if approved, its publication.
- The submission of the proposal also implies that the author(s) agrees with the publication, without resulting in remuneration, reimbursement, or compensation of any kind.
- The published texts are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the journal.
- Responsibility for any plagiarism is the responsibility of the author(s).
- The person responsible for the submission declares, under the penalties of the Law, that the information on the authorship of the work is complete and correct.
Also highlighted are the items related to our Editorial Policies, in particular on the Focus and Scope, Publication Ethics, Peer Review Process, and Open Access Policy.
