O que sabemos e o que falta investigar sobre a Lei Anticorrupção: mapeando conquistas, identificando aprimoramentos e estabelecendo uma agenda de pesquisa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v16i29.776Keywords:
editorial, lei anticorrupção, lei nº 12.846/2013Downloads
References
Yuan Yuan Ang. Unbundling Corruption: Revisiting Six Questions on Corruption. Global Perspectives, v. 1, no. 1 (2020):1-19.
Katrice Bridges Copeland. The Yates Memo: Looking for "Individual Accountability" in All the Wrong Places, Iowa Law Review, vol. 102 (2017): 1897-1926.
Kevin E. Davis, Guillermo Jorge, e Maíra R. Machado. “Coordinating the Enforcement of Anti-Corruption Law: South American Experiences.” Verfassung Und Recht in Übersee / Law and Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America, vol. 54, no. 2 (2021): 160–99.
Alison Jones e Caio Mário da Silva Pereira Neto, Combatting corruption and collusion in public procurement: Lessons from Operation Car Wash, University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. 71, supplement 1 (2021): 103-150.
Lipsky, M. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th anniversary expanded ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation (2010).
Mariana Pargendler, Veil Peeking: The Corporation as a Nexus for Regulation, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 169 (2021): 717-781.
Raquel de Mattos Pimenta, A construção dos acordos de leniência da lei anticorrupção, São Paulo: Ed. Blucher (2020).
Raquel de Mattos Pimenta e Otavio Venturini. International Cooperation and Negotiated Settlements for Transnational Bribery: A Study of the Odebrecht Case, Revista Direito GV, vol. 17, no 2 (2021):1-39.
Mariana Mota Prado, Redundancy as a Legal Strategy to Combat Corruption: Exploring the Potential of Institutional Multiplicity to Create Fail-Safe Systems, Current Legal Problems, Volume 77, Issue 1 (2024): 335–376.
Mariana Mota Prado e Eduardo Cornelius, Institutional Multiplicity and the Fight Against Corruption: A Research Agenda for the Brazilian Accountability Network, Rev. Direito GV, vol. 16, n.3 (2020):1-32.
Mariana Mota Prado e Raquel de Mattos Pimenta, Systemic corruption and institutional multiplicity: Brazilian examples of a complex relationship, University of Toronto Law Journal, vol. 74, supplement 1 (2021): 74-102.
Sally Yates, Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing, Memorandum from Deputy Attorney General Sally Q. Yates, Department of Justice, United States, September 9, 2015. Disponível em https://www.justice.gov/dag/file/769036/download
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista da CGU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Revista da CGU follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows the use and sharing of published works with mandatory indication of authors and sources. Contents published until 2019 have generic permission for use and sharing with mandatory indication of authorship and source.
We highlight some essential and non-exhaustive points related:
- The submission of the proposal implies a commitment not to submit it to another journal and authorizes if approved, its publication.
- The submission of the proposal also implies that the author(s) agrees with the publication, without resulting in remuneration, reimbursement, or compensation of any kind.
- The published texts are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the journal.
- Responsibility for any plagiarism is the responsibility of the author(s).
- The person responsible for the submission declares, under the penalties of the Law, that the information on the authorship of the work is complete and correct.
Also highlighted are the items related to our Editorial Policies, in particular on the Focus and Scope, Publication Ethics, Peer Review Process, and Open Access Policy.
