Access to Information as an Instrumental Right:
The Ecuadorian Ombudsman and Human Dignity in 2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v14i25.424Keywords:
Human Rights, Transparency, COVID-19, Ombudsman's Office, StateAbstract
This document aims to make an analysis of the incidence in favor of the exercise of the human right of access to public information by the Office of the Ombudsman of Ecuador during 2020, in the midst of the most serious health, economic and social crisis of the last century, caused by the covid-19 pandemic. For this, the text starts with a recount of the right to access to information, as a fundamental human right and that must be guaranteed in the XXI century as an instrumental right to other rights. Then, the pronouncements issued by the Ecuadorian Ombudsman (DPE) are reviewed and, especially, those related to access to public information, to end with a series of conclusions and recommendations in this regard. The study methodology is qualitative, made from the analysis of the content of the defensive pronouncements issued during 2020. The limitations of the research are given by the fact that the source of information was unique, with which it is recommended for future studies to be able to count with the other defense actions and, if applicable, from other relevant actors.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da CGU

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Revista da CGU follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows the use and sharing of published works with mandatory indication of authors and sources. Contents published until 2019 have generic permission for use and sharing with mandatory indication of authorship and source.
We highlight some essential and non-exhaustive points related:
- The submission of the proposal implies a commitment not to submit it to another journal and authorizes if approved, its publication.
- The submission of the proposal also implies that the author(s) agrees with the publication, without resulting in remuneration, reimbursement, or compensation of any kind.
- The published texts are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the journal.
- Responsibility for any plagiarism is the responsibility of the author(s).
- The person responsible for the submission declares, under the penalties of the Law, that the information on the authorship of the work is complete and correct.
Also highlighted are the items related to our Editorial Policies, in particular on the Focus and Scope, Publication Ethics, Peer Review Process, and Open Access Policy.
