Municipal anti-corruption settlements: challenges and perspectives.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v16i29.698Keywords:
Anti-corruption, settlement, municipalities, challenges, perspectivesAbstract
The article has the underutilization of anti-corruption agreements at the municipal level as a starting point. Possible explanations for this phenomenon include Law nº 12.846/2013’s lack of regulation, the absence of a bureaucratic structure dedicated to the issue, and the incipient governmental culture of non-litigious solutions. In addition to the institutional difficulties, there are several challenges in negotiating anti-corruption agreements, mainly related to the delimitation of amounts to pay. In this scenario, institutional support and the dissemination of knowledge by the Office of the Comptroller General can potentially expand and consolidate a local culture of successful agreements.
Downloads
References
Almeida, M.& Lira, Laura F. L. (2020). Retroatividade e Acordo de Leniência: a solução consensual da Lei Anticorrupção no tempo. Revista da AGU, 19(01),201-224 Recuperado de http://www.mpsp.mp.br/portal/page/portal/documentacao_e_divulgacao/doc_biblioteca/bibli_servicos_produtos/bibli_boletim/bibli_bol_2006/Rev-AGU_v.19_n.01.pdf.
Amaral, S. & Matheus, W. (2022). Diagnóstico Nacional do Controle Interno: Uma avaliação do nível de estruturação das Unidades Centrais de Controle Interno do Poder Executivo dos Municípios Brasileiros baseada no COSO I e IA-CM. World Bank Group. Recuperado de: https://conaci.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Digital-Diagnostico-Nacional-do-Controle-Interno.pdf .
Controladoria-Geral da União & Advocacia-Geral da União (2018a) IN CGU/AGU 02/2018. Recuperado de: https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/15160617/do1-2018-05-21-instrucao-normativa-n-2-de-16-de-maio-de-2018-15160613
Controladoria-Geral da União & Advocacia-Geral da União (2018b). Parecer 00231/2018/CONJUR-CGU/CGU/AGU, de 22 de agosto de 2018. Recuperado de https://repositorio.cgu.gov.br/handle/1/45702
Dipp, G. & Volkmer de Castilho, M. L. (2016). Comentários sobre a Lei Anticorrupção. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Fernandes, V.& Mendes, G. F. (2021, 13 de abril). Acordos de leniência e regimes sancionadores múltiplos. JOTA. Recuperado de https://www.jota.info/especiais/acordos-de-leniencia-e-regimes-sancionadores-multiplos-13042021
Guerra, S. & Palma, J. (2018). Art. 26 da LINDB: Novo regime jurídico de negociação com a Administração Pública. In. Rev. Direito Adm. Edição Especial: Direto Público na Lei de Introdução às Normas de Direito Brasileiro – LINDB (Lei 13.655/2018), 135-169Recuperado de: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rda/article/view/77653.
Ministério Público Federal (2017). Nota Técnica 1/2017 – 5ª CCR. Recuperado de http://www.mpf.mp.br/atuacao-tematica/ccr5/notas-tecnicas/docs/nt-01-2017-5ccr-acordo-de-leniencia-comissao-leniencia.pdf
Palma, J. & Marques Neto, F. (2022). Consensualidade Administrativa na Regulação: Acordos Substitutos no Setor de Telecomunicações. In J; Palma A. Voronoff & R. Toledo (Coord.) Direito Administrativo Sancionador Regulatório. São Paulo, SP: CEEJ.
Paula, F. & Kraft, A. (2023, 23 de maio). Acordos de leniência municipais: reflexões a partir do caso de São Paulo. JOTA. Recuperado de https://www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/artigos/acordos-de-leniencia-municipais-reflexoes-a-partir-do-caso-de-sao-paulo-23052023
Spagnolo, G. (2006). Leniency and whistleblowers in antitrust. In: Buccirossi, Paolo (Ed.), Handbook of Antitrust Economics. The MIT Press, Cambridge. Recuperado de https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4395738/mod_resource/content/1/SPAGNOLO%20-%20Leniency%20and%20Whistleblowers%20in%20Antitrust%20%28full%29.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista da CGU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Revista da CGU follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows the use and sharing of published works with mandatory indication of authors and sources. Contents published until 2019 have generic permission for use and sharing with mandatory indication of authorship and source.
We highlight some essential and non-exhaustive points related:
- The submission of the proposal implies a commitment not to submit it to another journal and authorizes if approved, its publication.
- The submission of the proposal also implies that the author(s) agrees with the publication, without resulting in remuneration, reimbursement, or compensation of any kind.
- The published texts are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the journal.
- Responsibility for any plagiarism is the responsibility of the author(s).
- The person responsible for the submission declares, under the penalties of the Law, that the information on the authorship of the work is complete and correct.
Also highlighted are the items related to our Editorial Policies, in particular on the Focus and Scope, Publication Ethics, Peer Review Process, and Open Access Policy.
