Alice: Challenges, results and perspectives of the continuous auditing tool for government procurement using artificial intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v14i26.530Keywords:
process automation, Continuous Auditing, Alice, public procurement, red flagsAbstract
Government procurements are carried out to implement policies and provide public services in a satisfactory manner to society. Purchases made by the Brazilian Federal Government correspond to 1.5% of the national Gross Domestic Product on average (R$119 billion in 2021). In addition to the large volume of resources, the public procurement process is perceived as very vulnerable to fraud (OECD, 2018). Considering the relevance, the total amount of expenses, and the risks involved, the Office of the Comptroller General created the Bidding, Contracts, and Tenders Analyzer (Analisador de Licitações, Contratos e Editais – Alice) with the objective of adding value to public management acting in a preventive and timely manner in relation to public procurement. The system automatically collects daily information about the processes underway in the Federal Government's main public procurement information systems, evaluates a set of risks, and raises red flags to direct the attention of the auditors and managers about situations that deviate from the reference standard. It is, therefore, a Continuous Auditing tool, with robotic automation of processes, which raises red flags about possible problems in public procurements. Alice accumulates positive results daily. More than R$ 9.7 billion in purchases have already been suspended based on its indications, only by the CGU. On the way to achieving these results, the CGU has experienced great challenges, as described in this report. The crucial point for the tool's success was the integration of its results into the ordinary work process of the CGU, with strong top management sponsorship. The tool is now evolving to add more functionalities that use artificial intelligence techniques, and to add new databases.
Downloads
References
AICPA. (2015). Audit Analytics and Continuous Audit: Looking Toward the Future. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc.
Bosio, E., Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., & Shleifer, A. (2020). Public Procurement in Law and Practice. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1091-1117. doi:DOI 10.3386/w27188
BRASIL. (2017, 11 22). Decreto nº9.203 de 22/11/2017. Dispõe sobre a política de governança da administração pública federal direta, autárquica e fundacional. Brasília. Retrieved 04 14, 2022, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2017/decreto/d9203.htm
CGU. (2017). Manual de Orientações Técnicas da Atividade de Auditoria Interna Governamental do Poder Executivo Federal. Brasília: Controladoria-Geral da União. Retrieved Abr 12, 2022, from https://www.gov.br/defesa/pt-br/arquivos/lai/auditoria/ciset/manuais-normativos-e-pop/manual_orient_tecnica_atividade_auditoria_interna_governamental.pdf
CGU. (2022). Relatório de Gestão CGU 2021. Brasília: Controladoria-Geral da União. Retrieved Abr 12, 2022, from https://repositorio.cgu.gov.br/bitstream/1/67793/8/Livro_Relatorio_Gestao_2021_v2.pdf
Chan, D., Chiu, V., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2018). Continuous Auditing: Theory and Application. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Costa, M., & Bastos, P. (2020). Alice, Monica, Adele, Sofia, Carina e Ágata: o uso da inteligência artificial pelo Tribunal de Contas da União. Revista do Tribunal de Contas do Estado de Goiás, 11-34.
Fantina, R., Storozhuk, A., & Goyal, K. (2022). Introducing Robotic Process Automation to Your Organization: A Guide for Business Leaders. New York: Apress. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-7416-3
Fortini, C., & Motta, F. (2016). Corrupção nas licitações e contratações públicas: sinais de alerta segundo a Transparência Internacional. Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional, Ano 16 n. 64(Abril/Junho - 2016), 93-113.
IIA. (2009). Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) 13 - Fraud Prevention and Detection in an Automated World. Altamore Springs: The Institute of Internal Auditors Inc.
OECD. (2018). The MAPS Analytical Framework. Retrieved Abril 27, 2022, from Methodology for Assessing Procurement Systems (MAPS): https://www.mapsinitiative.org/methodology/
OECD. (2021). Government at a Glance 2021. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/1c258f55-en
Oliveira, E., Pedrosa, C., Silva, S., Costa, W., & Silva, J. (2021). O Uso de Tecnologias Para Detecção de Fraudes na Pandemia da Covid-19. Revista Contabilidade e Controladoria, 13(1), 156-177.
Panis, A., Isidro, A., Carneiro, D., Montezano, L., Resende Junior, P., & Sano, H. (2021). Inovação em compras públicas: Atividades e resultados no caso do robô Alice da Controladoria-Geral da União. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (CGPC), 27(86), 1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v27n86.83111
Ribeiro, C. G., & Inácio Júnior, E. (2019). O Mercado de Compras Governamentais Brasileiro (2006-2017): mensuração e análise. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada – ipea. Retrieved from https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=34850
Riedel, L., & Ferreira, L. (2021). Aplicabilidade do compliance com o suporte da inteligência artificial no combate a corrupção nos processos licitatórios. In A. Vasconcelos, Ciências Jurídicas: Fundamentação, participação e efetividade (pp. 78-90). Ponta Grossa: Atena Editora. doi:10.22533/at.ed.906211506
SFC/CGU. (2021). Relatório Gerencial: Capacidade operacional da atividade de auditoria interna governamental da CGU em 2021. Brasília: Secretaria Federal de Controle Interno.
Tátrai, T., & Németh, A. (2018, Mai 14). Improving red flag instruments for public procurement. ERA Fórum, 267-285. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-018-0513-8
VARGAS, R. (2009). Gerenciamento de projetos - Estabelecendo diferenciais competitivos (7a ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Brasport Livros e Multimídia Ltda.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da CGU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Revista da CGU follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows the use and sharing of published works with mandatory indication of authors and sources. Contents published until 2019 have generic permission for use and sharing with mandatory indication of authorship and source.
We highlight some essential and non-exhaustive points related:
- The submission of the proposal implies a commitment not to submit it to another journal and authorizes if approved, its publication.
- The submission of the proposal also implies that the author(s) agrees with the publication, without resulting in remuneration, reimbursement, or compensation of any kind.
- The published texts are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the journal.
- Responsibility for any plagiarism is the responsibility of the author(s).
- The person responsible for the submission declares, under the penalties of the Law, that the information on the authorship of the work is complete and correct.
Also highlighted are the items related to our Editorial Policies, in particular on the Focus and Scope, Publication Ethics, Peer Review Process, and Open Access Policy.
