Joining forces for integrity: how horizontal accountability policies can increase capacity of municipal comptrollerships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v15i27.621Keywords:
Public policy, Public integrity, Municipal internal control, Accountability, State capacityAbstract
This quantitative research adopts non-parametric tests to assess how the effectiveness of an integrity policy (Join Forces Program), implemented by a horizontal accountability body (Public Prosecutor of Santa Catarina’ State - PPSC) to prevent corruption, can influence changes in capacity and practices of internal integrity system in municipal governments. Five outputs are analyzed based on products resulting from policy measures proposed – corresponding to variables identified in the programmatic objectives – with data collected in surveys by PPSC in 2020 and in the initial diagnosis of 2015 (creation), and the number of criminal cases opened by PPSC. The municipalities were divided according to program enforcement: non-participants; monitored by Civil Inquiry (CI=median enforcement); and signed a Conduct Adjustment Term (CAT=high enforcement, subject to greater obligations). Statistically significant improvements occurred in all variables, except for the number of criminal cases (confidence level close to the 95% threshold, considering p<0.05), confirming the hypothesis that greater changes occur through CAT. It allows inferring that the changes were: quite high in V2-type of the controller's contract; V3-existing auditor career/position; and V4-representations from the controllership to PPSC; moderate on V1-workers at controllership; and V5-special accounts processes (investigations) opened internally; and low in V6-criminal cases. As expected, the internal improvements are not related to the increase in criminal prosecutions, that is, it is too early to evaluate/refuse the anticorruption effectiveness, except for the changes in V4-representations to the PPSC – evidencing the success of the objectives of increasing capacity and bringing closer the actors, deserving follow-up.
Downloads
References
Angeli, A.E., Silva, J.W.G. e Santos, R.A. (2020). As controladorias municipais em perspectiva analítica. Revista da CGU, 12(21), 23-44. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v12i21
Aranha, A.L.M. e Filgueiras, F. (2016). Instituições de accountability no Brasil. Cadernos Enap, 44. Recuperado de https://repositorio.enap.gov.br/bitstream/1/2561/1/Caderno%2044.pdf
CGU - Controladoria-Geral da União. (2006). Portaria nº. 363, de 6 de junho. Institui o Programa de Fortalecimento da Gestão Municipal. DOU.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2a. ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CONACI - Conselho Nacional de Controle Interno. (2020, 12 de dezembro). Conaci e Banco Mundial divulgam Diagnóstico Nacional de Controle Interno. Recuperado de http://www.conaci.org.br/noticias/conaci-e-banco-mundial-divulgam-diagnostico-nacional-de-controle-interno
De Bona, R.S. (2021). Políticas de integridad y anticorrupción en Brasil: el papel de la Contraloría-General en Estados y Capitales. Revista CGG, 24(3), 389-405. Recuperado de http://dx.doi.org/10.51341/1984-3925_2021v24n3a8
__________. (2022). Sistema de Integridad Local en Brasil: Análisis de actores internos en pequeñas ciudades de Santa Catarina. Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania, 27(86), 1-20. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.12660/cgpc.v27n86.82898
De Bona, R.S., Borba, J.A. e Miranda, R.G. (2020). Barômetro de risco da governança municipal. Revista da CGU, 12(21), 45-63. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v12i21.170
Dye, T.R. (2013). Understanding public policy (14a. ed.). Prentice Hall.
Gomide, A.A. e Pires, R. (Ed.) (2014). Capacidades estatais e democracia. IPEA.
Hedrih, V. e Hedrih, A. (2022). Interpreting statistics for beginners. Routledge.
Huberts, L. (2018). Integrity: What it is and why it’s important. Public Integrity, 20(1), 18-32. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2018.1477404
Johnsøn, J. (2012). Theories of change in anti-corruption work. U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Issue 6.
Klitgaard, R. (2015). Addressing corruption together. OECD.
Maeda, B.C. (2013). Programas de Compliance e Anticorrupção?: importância e elementos essenciais. Em A. Del Debbio, B.Maeda, A.Carneiro e C.H.Silva (Coord.). Temas de Anticorrupção e Compliance (pp. 167–201). Elsevier.
Mazzili, H.N. (2000). O inquérito civil (2ª. ed.). Saraiva.
__________. (2006). A defesa dos interesses difusos em juízo (19ª. ed.). Saraiva.
McDevitt, A. (2014). Local Integrity System Assessment Toolkit. Transparency International.
Moore, D.S., McCabe, G.P. y Craig, B.A. (2014). Introduction to the Practice of Statistics (8a. ed.). W.H.Freeman &Co.
MPSC - Ministério Público de Santa Catarina. (2015, 20 de agosto). MPSC lança programa para fortalecer o controle interno dos municípios. Recuperado de https://www.mpsc.mp.br/noticias/mpsc-lanca-programa-para-fortalecer-o-controle-interno-dos-municipios
__________. (2022). Programa Unindo Forcas. Recuperado de https://www.mpsc.mp.br/programas/unindo-forcas
O’Donnell, G. (1998). Accountability horizontal e novas poliarquias. Lua Nova, 44, 27-54. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-64451998000200003
OCDE – Organização para Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico (2022). Recomendación de la OCDE sobre Integridad Pública. Recuperado de https://www.oecd.org/gov/integridad/recomendacion-integridad-publica
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3a. ed.). Sage.
Pinho, J.A.G. e Sacramento, A.R.S. (2009). Accountability: já podemos traduzi-la para o português? Revista de Adm. Pública, 43(6), 1343-1368. Recuperado de https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-76122009000600006
Pope, J. (2000). Confronting corruption: the elements of a National Integrity System. TI Sourcebook 2000. Transparency International.
Rizzardo, A. (2014). Ação civil pública e ação de improbidade administrativa (3ª. ed.). Forense.
Rocha, A.C. (2013). Accountability: constituinte necessária das sociedades democráticas. Revista ReFAE, 5(1), 81-100. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.15603/2176-9583/refae.v5n1p81-100
Six, F.E. e Lawton, A. (2013). Towards a theory of integrity systems. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(4) 639-658. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313501124
Stoyanov, A., Gerganov, A., Di Nicola, A. e Costantino, F. (2015). Monitoring anti-corruption in Europe. CSD Reports.
Taylor, M.M. (2019). Alcançando a accountability (Trad. V.M. Leite). Revista da CGU, 11(20), 1311-1330. https://doi.org/10.36428/revistadacgu.v11i20.176
Villoria, M. e Jiménez-Sanchez, F. (2012). ¿Cuánta corrupción hay en España? Revista de Estudios Políticos, 156, 13-47. Recuperado de https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/RevEsPol/article/view/40032
Weible, C.M. e Sabatier, P.A. (Ed.). Theories of the Policy Process (4a. ed.). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista da CGU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Revista da CGU follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY), which allows the use and sharing of published works with mandatory indication of authors and sources. Contents published until 2019 have generic permission for use and sharing with mandatory indication of authorship and source.
We highlight some essential and non-exhaustive points related:
- The submission of the proposal implies a commitment not to submit it to another journal and authorizes if approved, its publication.
- The submission of the proposal also implies that the author(s) agrees with the publication, without resulting in remuneration, reimbursement, or compensation of any kind.
- The published texts are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the journal.
- Responsibility for any plagiarism is the responsibility of the author(s).
- The person responsible for the submission declares, under the penalties of the Law, that the information on the authorship of the work is complete and correct.
Also highlighted are the items related to our Editorial Policies, in particular on the Focus and Scope, Publication Ethics, Peer Review Process, and Open Access Policy.
